How to Evaluate Online Success – New action research with 24 institutions
Published Paper
Abstract
How to measure and define the success of cultural websites and online services is a problem common to all parts of the cultural sector – museums, archives, galleries, arts organisations, libraries, publishers. Worse, funding agencies and government departments lack the expertise to offer guidelines or set standards. The result is a confusing mixture of statistics and reporting that reveals little about genuine user satisfaction.
In mid 2010 a group of 24 organisations and agencies from across the cultural heritage and arts sector in the UK began collaborating on a piece of action research addressing the issues around 'evaluating online success'. Coordinated by Culture24 and working with Seb Chan, the group of institutions have been developing a framework and best practice guide for measuring online projects both on organisational websites and those presented through social media channels.
This mini-workshop will present the findings of the project to date, along with several case studies from partner institutions, anonymised where necessary, demonstrating the impact of metrics customisations, cross-sector audience segmentation, and benchmarking.
The full list of project partners is:
- Powerhouse Museum
- British Library
- National Gallery
- Science Museum
- Tate
- British Museum
- Kew
- National Maritime Museum
- Imperial War Museum
- National Portrait Gallery
- Watershed
- Royal Shakespeare Company
- National Museums Scotland
- National Museum Wales
- Design Museum
- English Heritage
- Roundhouse
- DCMS
- Arts Council of England
- Heritage Lottery Fund
- Museums, Libraries & Archives Council (MLA)
- University of Leicester
- Birmingham Museums & Art Gallery




